What are the most common root cause analysis (RCA) mistakes and how do I avoid them?

Asset Managment

Some of the most common root cause analysis mistakes involve poor definitions or focusing too much on the wrong thing. Others simply ignore root causes entirely, rendering the process pointless.

Not quite defining the problem

One of the most important parts of root cause analysis is defining the problem well. When defining the problem at hand, just saying something is wrong isn’t enough. Rather, you want to dig into the specifics of when it occurs, how prevalent it is, and any domino effects it causes.

Often, businesses don’t get specific enough about the actual problem, and that leads their RCA down the wrong path.

Focusing on the wrong things

Another frequent issue is a tendency to go on odd tangents instead of focusing on the root processes.

For example, if you need to rework a corrective maintenance task performed last week, you might end up looking too much at your people and not enough at procedures. This might take you down a tangent where you find the work failed because Jerry wasn’t paying attention, which happened because he was tired from lack of sleep because the baby wouldn’t stop crying. It might be a root cause, but there’s nothing actionable there.

A better route would be to see how your maintenance processes might have failed to account for human error. The job failed because there were no quality control processes in place in case someone did something wrong. Unlike Jerry’s sleep schedule, that’s something you can change.

Going too narrow

Conversely, instead of branching out on weird tangents, another common mistake is taking your RCA too narrow. If you have a complex systemic issue, you’ll need to account for multiple contributing causes, not just one. Yet companies often focus on just one issue to the exclusion of all else.

To solve this problem, use a tool that will help you look at multiple factors, such as fault tree analysis or a fishbone diagram.

Ignoring the results

Once you get some potential root causes, you need to make plans based on your findings. Teams will sometimes revert to the more superficial “causes” in their analysis, ignoring the root causes entirely. In doing so, they end up treating symptoms rather than problems.

Ignoring data is actually pretty common. Oil rigs might ignore 99% of their sensor data. Management teams might ignore the true causes of their problems.

Basically, when you get to the end or your RCA, find solutions to the root problems you find first.

Want to keep reading?

Good choice. Here are some similar articles!

What's a function and what's functional failure?

A function describes the intention of a piece of equipment, while functional failures detail conditions that would prevent equipment from peak operation.

Asset Managment
View Article

What is the best way to use failure codes for root cause analysis?

Use failure codes systematically: start with analyzing the reasons for failures, code this information in a consistent way, and make it accessible.

Asset Managment
View Article

What are the five pillars of maintenance and reliability?

The SMRP identified five pillars of maintenance and reliability to help facility managers create a framework for their businesses.

Asset Managment
View Article
GET STARTED

Sign up for a personalized tour today.

Information is 100% secure.
UpKeep logo

Sign up for newsletter!

Our newsletter full of inspiration, podcasts, trends & news.

UpKeep logo

Sign up for newsletter!

Our newsletter full of inspiration, podcasts, trends & news.

UpKeep icon
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. Privacy Policy